Join us on Facebook!Follow us on Twitter!

Scottsdale’s Own P. T. Barnum—Bob Littlefield

By: Jim Derouin

Scottsdale’s version of P. T. Barnum, Bob Littlefield, is back.  After twelve unproductive years on the City Council, he needs a job and is now running for Mayor.   He wrote a column in The Scottsdale Republic, which portrays himself as a crusader for citizen issues, entitled:  “Scottsdale Needs a Leader Who Will Protect Its Unique Character.”  Well, that’s Bob’s version of the truth.  In fact, Scottsdale has never seen a more self-promoting, negative, destructive and divisive politician in its history.

Bob argued that someone is proposing commercial development in the Sonoran Preserve.  Wrong.  Bob attacks everyone who disagrees with him as being an agent of a developer; literally, he sees a developer behind every tree.  Wrong.  Bob is also wrong when he pits North against South in bond elections; and when he was so reckless in his opposition to city bond measures that he shot down a school bond initiative that got caught in his irresponsible rhetoric.  He calls that “leadership.”  If that is “leadership,” we don’t need it.

He also rants against apartments and density, but, in typical fashion, Bob was for density before he was against it. He not only voted for the two tallest buildings in Scottsdale (known as the Scottsdale Waterfront Towers), but, in doing so, he also voted to impose an emergency clause which cut off the right of citizens to challenge the vote.  An emergency clause is intended to be used when immediate implementation of an action is needed for matters threatening public health or safety; it was never intended for constructing a residential building.  Subsequently, state law was changed to specifically prohibit the use of the emergency clause for such a purpose.  Isn’t this curious conduct for someone who claims to be the Great Crusader against density?  It is also important to realize that Scottsdale would benefit if more of the 100,000 commuters who work in Scottsdale, and who drive to and from Scottsdale daily, actually lived here.  Apartments and condominiums, although not for most of us, represent the new entry point for many “buyers” and are attractive for many who want to both live and work in Scottsdale.  Having residents being able to both live and work in Scottsdale has many benefits that shouldn’t be ignored out of hand.

Bob also continues to take credit for fighting “wasteful subsidies.”  He knows full well, however, that subsidies are outlawed by the state constitution and, also, specifically in the Scottsdale City Charter.  I know because I served on the Task Force that recommended adding the prohibition to the City Charter, a provision that was, subsequently, approved by voters.  In short, if something is a “subsidy,” it is both illegal and unconstitutional.  If something is not a “subsidy,” then a candidate shouldn’t be misleading voters by calling it one.  But this approach is consistent with Bob’s strategy to be loudly against things for the sake of letting us know, loudly, that he is against things.  Never let an opportunity go by to attack someone else’s idea.

In short, Bob is a garden variety professional politician; and what Bob really stands for, besides himself, is stagnation--the reduction of Scottsdale’s tax base, the decline of tax revenues, the decline of services, the decay of infrastructure and the reduction of the quality of life for City residents.  He is a “free lunch” politician, arguing that we can have all the services, infrastructure and quality of life we want provided that we just do nothing.   His shtick is stale; the con job is old. Bob should get a private sector job and stop pretending that he is Robin Hood.  That role has already been cast.

  • Ron McDonald

    You talk about voting down a school bond initiative like it’s a BAD thing. Not one link to a newspaper article?

    This “article” is a political screed, nothing more.

  • Tom Lane

    Negative campaigning isn’t going to get out the vote, and this article certainly represents the best example of negative campaigning that I’ve seen. First of all, WHO do you actually SUPPORT for Mayor? The reader is left with no clue as to who YOU think the BEST candidate is, and WHY.

    Second, you are INCORRECT that there are no plans for commercial development in the preserve. The current city council has big plans for the DDC – the Desert Discovery Center, at the Gateway Trailhead. Bob Littlefield OPPOSES the DDC.

    Save the Saguaros! Commercial development does not belong in a nature preserve. It is totally inappropriate to destroy native plants in their natural setting, for such a development. As for the two towers the Bob voted for, that was years ago under a different era of Scottsdale politics. Since then, Mayor JIm Lane and the current council have given contracts to developers of “Smart Growth Towers,” building tall condos all over Scottsdale, destroying the City’s beautiful mountain views, and clogging the streets with traffic. Bob Littlefield has voted against these Jim Lane smart growth towers.

    As for commuters being able to live AND also WORK in Scottsdale, why do they need to be in towers that are so dense, and so tall, that they block mountain views, and clog the streets with traffic and parked cars? Why not set a height ordinance of two stories, like in Sedona and Cave Creek, or, three stories, like in Carlsbad?

    Finally, your analogies to P.T. Barnum, Robin Hood, and allegations that Bob will cause stagnation of the tax base, declining services, and reduction of the quality of life in Scottsdale, are insults to Bob. In fact, the tax base in Scottsdale is a result of hard working businesses who have moved to The City. Services will not decline if Littlefield is elected, since roads and public transportation are provided by other city departments besides the Mayor’s office. Overall, your article is short on specifics and full of generalities, and leaves the reader without any clue of who to vote for. – Tom Lane / VOTE BOB LITTLEFIELD FOR SCOTTSDALE MAYOR 2016

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to Arizona Progress Gazette and receive notifications of new articles by email.

Search this Site!
Featured Authors