Join us on Facebook!Follow us on Twitter!

Why I am voting NO on Prop 123.

By State Treasurer of Arizona Jeff DeWit

Proposition 123 is LESS money for schools and RAISES PROPERTY TAXES

I wish I could support Proposition 123.  I wish it was in the best interest of our schools, teachers, and taxpayers.  I wish it lived up to the claim of being “more money for schools without raising taxes.”  Unfortunately it is none of these things.

Anytime politicians tell you they have found a way to spend money without raising taxes, they are either raising debt or raiding a trust fund.  It is why our federal government owes $19 Trillion and our Social Security Trust Fund is depleted.  Our federal government has made false promises, and Arizona is now following suit.

Proposition 123 is a raid on the Schools’ Permanent Endowment Trust Fund which was established by Congress at Arizona’s statehood.  It is a pool of money intended to grow for the benefit of educating Arizona schoolchildren forever.  We can spend interest, but we are never to spend principle, as this plan does in a BIG way.  Proposition 123 violates this Congressional requirement, and if passed, a new multi-year lawsuit will likely begin, further delaying funding for our schools.

The politicians are saying that this Trust is “underperforming our schools.”  This is incorrect.  The amount we spend on schools from the Trust is now the highest in Arizona history, roughly $100 million a year, and should double about every seven years.  Voting NO on Proposition 123 keeps this money for its intended purpose, benefiting our schools forever.  Saying yes cuts the trust fund by over a third, costs our schools (and ultimately our taxpayers) Billions of dollars, keeps teacher pay at 50th in the country, raises property taxes, and creates a huge fiscal cliff in ten years that will hit hardworking taxpayers.

Let me say part of that again.  Right now Arizona is 50th in the country in teacher pay.  If Prop 123 passes, and the trust fund is raided, and when property taxes increase, we will still be 50th in the country in teacher pay!  As the Arizona Republic has pointed out, this is merely a "scam" on the voters to make them think that this is free money, when in reality it comes at a very high price to our children, teachers, and taxpayers.  Read here: http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2016/04/18/montini-gov-doug-ducey-league-of-women-voters-proposition-123-arizona-legislature-state-land-trust/83157214/ 

The public is also being told that Prop 123 is “more money for teachers.”  Anyone that reads the language of this bill know this is not true, and their claim was also ‘fact-checked’ by the Republic recently and given ZERO stars and rated “False.” (http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/fact-check/2016/03/05/fact-check-no-requirement-prop-123-money-go-directly-classrooms/80990218/) Prop 123 does the opposite, it is purposefully written to make it possible for the money to go to administrative raises without a single dollar going to a teacher or classroom.

And a dirty little secret of Prop 123 is that it will also increase Trust fund payouts to the State Hospital and State Prisons, among other non-school related spending increases.

Bottom Line: Proposition 123 is LESS money for schools, and RAISES property taxes (see AZ Republic November 18th, 2015).  It is shameful that the proponents are misleadingly telling the public otherwise.  Quite frankly, if the Yes on 123 campaign was a business instead of a political campaign it would be guilty of fraudulent advertising.  It seems to be an unfortunate rule of thumb in today’s political world that since the politicians supporting Prop 123 will be out of office in eight years or less, they care little that when this plan expires in ten years our school finances will be a mess and taxpayers will foot a huge bill.

Before being elected as Treasurer, I had never run for office.  Like many, I was frustrated with the poor financial decisions being made on our behalf, and took a huge pay cut to help our government make smarter decisions with taxpayer money.

We can do better.  We can solve the inflation funding lawsuit without raiding the Trust, provide higher pay to teachers, and save taxpayers from a huge fiscal cliff.  But the only way Arizona gets there is by voting NO on 123, as I will be doing.

-Jeff DeWit

State Treasurer of Arizona

  • BeenAroundTheBlock

    The Scoundrels’ Means for Funding Arizona Education

    Yesterday I received my voter’s information packet on Prop 123. My jaw dropped at what I read. Then, this afternoon Fred DuVal robocalled to say HE supports this monstrous affront to the citizens of Arizona and to our educational system–this guy pretends to be progressive?

    Prop 123 is nothing but a land-grab charading as support for education when the real support has been ILLEGALLY denied by the AZ State Legislature in open DEFIANCE OF A COURT ORDER TO DO SO. Funding education in accordance to Prop 123 lets the Governor and Legislature weasel out of paying the court ordered lawsuit settlement. They have systematically ignored the DEMOCRATICALLY-VOTED WILL of the CITIZENS OF ARIZONA and the ARIZONA STATE CONSTITUTION.

    If you want to really see who REALLY benefits from Proposition 123, let me list those who wrote in favor in the voter’s guide. Just follow the money….

    – Sharon Harper: Buisinesswoman (“Lets Vote Yes for AZ Schools”)
    – Doug Ducy (Republican Governor)
    – David Gowan (Republican AZ Speaker of the House)
    – Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry
    – Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
    – NAIOP-AZ (an Arizona real estate association)
    – Frank Riggs (Former Republican Gubernatorial candidate, (2014). Frank Riggs has been a national leader of SCHOOL CHOICE and education reform over the past two decades.)
    – Arizona Chamber Foundation (Foundation of the AZ Chamber of Commerce)
    – Arizona Manufacturers Council
    – East Valley Chambers of Commerce Alliance
    – Americans for Prosperity (ultra-conservative advocacy group founded by the Koch brothers)
    – Greater Phoenix Leadership Council (a business leadership organization focused on civic-improvement initiatives for the state.)

    Need more reasons to oppose this slight-of-hand?
    – This proposition was delivered to the House for its approval by the Governor with minimum notice or time for review and comment by the general public.

    – The proposition was slated for this “Special Election”, because they know very few people fully carefully read the propositions, much less cast off-cycle votes.

    – Depleting the Arizona Educational Trust lands will mean the income generated by that land-grant asset is gone forever… They claim to not raise taxes, but only for today, and only for themselves… tomorrow’s support for education will HAVE to come out of new taxes for because renewable income from our grant will have been depleted.

    – Governor Ducey decimated education funding for community colleges, universities and K-12. He currently presides over a budget surplus, yet will not spend a dime on education–except by converting this publicly-held legacy asset into to private property for his friends. If this is not “establishment cronyism governance” I don’t know what is. Shame on him and all who support this travesty. No wonder we’re all angry at government…this is why… high-order high-jinks.

    VOTE NO on PROP 123.

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to Arizona Progress Gazette and receive notifications of new articles by email.

Search this Site!
Featured Authors