Join us on Facebook!Follow us on Twitter!

Littlefield The Lilliputian on Residents’ Rights

He Chuckled Like Jabba The Hut Before He Killed Citizen Rights

Avid Star Wars fans will remember Jabba The Hutt’s laughter at the beginning of Return of the Jedi.

That’s the way many probably feel after reading former Scottsdale City Councilman, defeated State Legislative candidate and current Scottsdale Mayoral candidate Bob Littlefield’s recent tome.

After resembling Grumpy during the early days of his quixotic quest to join his wife on the Scottsdale City Council, Littlefield proffers a sunnier disposition outlining some of the things that are good about Scottsdale before assigning responsibility alone to residents – not businesses – who helped make them happen. Jabba_the_Hutt

President Obama is in Cuba this week.  Littlefield’s reasoning reminds us a bit of Che Guevara. Or Bernie Sanders, who was in Phoenix this week.  People good.  Business bad.  It sounds more like Sweden than Scottsdale. 

But we return to Jabba.  His laughter soon gave way to demise as he was choked to death by Princess Leia seeking to escape his grip.

The scene is apt to describe Littlefield’s disqualifying hypocrisy on so many matters because no one in recent Scottsdale history has choked out citizen rights more than Bob Littlefield.

How?

Because back when the Scottsdale Waterfront was but an idea – and didn’t include the two tallest residential buildings in the city – Bob Littlefield not only voted for them he did so with an “emergency clause.”  What’s that mean?  He viewed the project’s density so important – akin to a fire or flood – that he took away the rights of the many opponents at the time to challenge their government via a referendum.  The project almost certainly would have gone to the Scottsdale ballot and lost.  But Brother Bob never gave those residents respect or rights.

 

  • Bill Crawford

    Should one Scottsdale council person be allowed to vote twice on issues? I don’t think so. But that’s exactly what is being proposed by Bob Littlefield, a candidate for the mayor’s office. You see, Bob’s wife was elected to the council in 2014. Bob worked very hard on her campaign. It wasn’t the first time he’s tried to stack the council. He worked on Guy Phillips campaign, and he worked hard promoting Cindy Hill’s failed campaign. This latest stunt is the most egregious attempt yet by Bob to further his own personal agenda regardless of what’s best for Scottsdale’s citizens. The council should be a diverse group of representatives with different perspectives and view points, debating the issues and reaching a consensus. It’s hard to imagine any genuine distinction between the two Littlefields. We’ve already had twelve years of Bob on the city council and we get two more years of his wife Kathy. I believe the Littlefield’s party of “no” has been and is presently well represented on the council. Why should they get two votes, two paychecks and possibly two pensions from the generosity of the citizens of Scottsdale? Enough is enough.

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to Arizona Progress Gazette and receive notifications of new articles by email.

Search this Site!
Featured Authors